Spam Disruption
-=-
D.Lim: It is really something to have people twisting your words and make you own up to what you have not said.
----- Original Message -----
From: Inter.net Canada
To: dlim@interlog.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: Spam - Your regretable policy
Dear David Lim,
We thank you for taking the time to reply.
As stated below, SPAM is not illegal in Canada but it is highly frowned upon by our company and all the other ISP's. SPAM is the #1 plague on the Internet and costs billions of dollars every year to both customers and ISP's. In order to reduce the impact of SPAM sent to and from our servers, Inter.net Canada has an Acceptable Use Policy that can be found here : http://www.ca.inter.net/en/join/aup.php.
We prevent over 3 million SPAM emails per week to be sent to our customers, this number represents a whopping 90% of emails
going through our servers.
You even stated yourself below that you replied to the client's SPAM by sending out a message to him that would be unsolicited. The
person reported the email as being SPAM and the appropriate measures had to be taken. We are not trying to hinder your rights
as a free person in any way, but you have to remain in the guidelines of our Acceptable Use Policy and this did not.
As much as we would like to argue with you, the fact remains you sent out an unsolicited email.
If there is any other way we can be of assistance, please contact us by replying to this email or communicating by phone to our Customer service department, which is available to you 24 hours a day. We are always pleased to assist you.
Sincerely,
Mathieu St-Amour
Supervisor
Tel: 1-800-920-7873 or 514-481-2585
Fax: 1-888-478-2745 or 514-481-2785
Inter.net Canada Ltd.
www.ca.inter.net
----- Original Message -----
From: dlim@interlog.com
To: Inter.net Canada
Cc: JosephYLee@aol.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: Spam - Your regretable policy
¡@
Thank you very much for your reply.
An electronic message is "spam" IF:
(1) the recipient's personal identity and context are irrelevant because the message is equally applicable to many other potential recipients; AND (2) the recipient has not verifiably granted deliberate, explicit, and still-revocable permission for it to be sent; AND
(3) the transmission and reception of the message appears to the recipient to give a disproportionate benefit to the sender.
All of these apply to the message since the recipient himself sent a complaint to AOL that the message was unsolicited. The message also
included a link to your website http://pages.interlog.com/~dlim which promotes your services as a photographer.
Thank you for your definition of "spam".
My photographic service is probably too dear for people like you to afford (I guess. Ever imagine you can spend thousands of dollars for a shot?). Many overestimate their own importance.
This person, as my own log confirms, is said to be a Korean Christian on his own web site, who sent an unsolicited e-mail (of his CHEMISTRY e-mail ministry) to me in the first place. I was/am responding to his invitation. And as a free person(you seems to be trying hard to take away these rights and foster a rigid rule for contact/reply)I may respond in many ways as I please.
This person, if careful to check his own record(perhaps his automatic software does not allow him to compare notes in the first place), ought to have my e-mail in his data-base in the first place, for his solicitation. This tell people how easy it is to disregard something.
I just replied to foster friendship.
Unlike some accusers, I have many career and qualification, and will always appear to have more to tell/represent.
Not all ISPs function as your own self.
The accuser could have replied for clarification, unsubscription or simply block the sender. A big fuss is made, with ir-repairable damages.
You are acting beyond the law of the land, as you claim that SPAM is not illegal by Canadian Law.
I think some good souls out there would be more incline to work with the law of the land, or be good characters.
I try not to pile up lies, and falsehood, and conjecture in my mind. Do you not want to occupy yourselves with beautiful things instead?
The words "if", "might be" can fabricate worlds of falsehood, and wrongly steer logic/reasoning. I prefer to be realistic.
Evidence is not a matter of "if" or "might".
The device of AOL is described by yourselves leaves much room for improvement. Your software probably works like your very selves.
Again, I would say that Jesus Christ, I believe, can change your lives and values in positive ways.
David Lim
----- Original Message -----
From: Inter.net Canada
To: dlim@interlog.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Spam - Your regretable policy
¡@
Dear David Lim,
We thank you for taking the time to contact us.
In response, in the past year over 98 billion emails were sent through our servers and 4% of it were legitimate emails. SPAM is the indisputable
scourge on the Internet and we need to take action against it since Canadian Law still does not make SPAM illegal.
Keep in mind that this is only 1 complaint that we have received from someone at AOL. This means that there might be many more emails being
sent without your knowledge since you even confirm that you do not send emails to AOL. Your failure to comply to get an anti-virus or firewall
software to protect your computer leaves us no choice but to suspend the account in the event of any future complaints.
We contacted AOL since they are the ones taking out the user information from the headers. They have told us that the spam was reported
by JosephYLee@aol.com and he deemed it was unsolicited. This means that they reported this email as spam by using the automatic AOL
feature or they have a spam reporting software that does it automatically.
If you do leave our company due to a suspension of service we wish to remind you that all the other ISP's will suspend you for sending out SPAM.
Here is the technical definition of SPAM :
An electronic message is "spam" IF:
(1) the recipient's personal identity and context are irrelevant because the message is equally applicable to many other potential recipients; AND (2) the recipient has not verifiably granted deliberate, explicit, and still-revocable permission for it to be sent; AND
(3) the transmission and reception of the message appears to the recipient to give a disproportionate benefit to the sender.
All of these apply to the message since the recipient himself sent a complaint to AOL that the message was unsolicited. The message also
included a link to your website http://pages.interlog.com/~dlim which promotes your services as a photographer.
If there is any other way we can be of assistance, please contact us by replying to this email or communicating by phone to our Customer service department, which is available to you 24 hours a day. We are always pleased to assist you.
Sincerely,
Mathieu St-Amour
Supervisor
Tel: 1-800-920-7873 or 514-481-2585
Fax: 1-888-478-2745 or 514-481-2785
Inter.net Canada Ltd.
www.ca.inter.net
----- Original Message -----
From: dlim@interlog.com
To: Inter.net Canada
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Spam - Your regretable policy
¡@
Thank you very much for your e-mail after a phone call.
You claimed that you received many complaints, and have to take action.
Your e-mail warning in the past could not be replied to for any follow up.
I do not know anybody of undisclosed e-mail account. It is impossible in my part to send any e-mail to undisclosed or account with unknown address.
Please send real evidence if you have any.
One e-mail complaint hardly constituted to "many". I regard this as your refusal to send evidence or that you have born false witness.
You cannot put on any coverup and claim that you have real complaint. I regard this as false witness.
To the best of my knowledge AOL is a large company, and I have not sent any e-mail to AOL. Users of services ofAOL are not AOL, just as I am not Inter.net or your good self.
There is no evidence that the alleged recepient has been repeatedly receiving the same or anything from me. One off spam? Have you not sent me e-mail(in the name of warning) without my consent or foreknowledge? How are you going to comply to your rule and remove/suspend yourselves from further e-mailing me? You need to be reported that it is SPAM to take action instead of using common sense? I report you then. OK? I suppose your excuse will come soon as another solicitation without my foreknowledge.
Definition of "SPAM" includes the characteristics of untraceable source from unknown person. It does appear that a e-mail address with my name on is easily traceable and not from unknown person. I also have freedom to solicit friendship through any medium. The receipient could reply and ask me to take him/her off my list. Your evidence does not demonstrate any such action. I have no other means of taking such hostile or unsociable entity off my list.
This receipient/evidence of yours appear to me to be someone who aim to hurt me and effect some disruptive service instead of suffering from spam or from my invitation. You appear to be less than friendly and helpful.
I regret to have joined Interlog or your Inter.net Canada. Canadian friendliness does not appear to be part of your character.
In law, in case you know any, defendant has to right to know and face the accuser. You have violated this rule with what you have done.
You sound legalistic, yet with a front of illegal and unfriendly move.
You also indicate you have a zero tolerance policy of complaint (your words: if we receive any further complaints we will have no choice but to suspend your plan. )
I will have to leave your company and service and ask for full refund of the remaining fees paid in any case(or action) of your suspension or lack of service.
Any inconvinence caused by your action and attitude is very regretable.
I would like to suggest that you come to investigate into the salvation of Jesus Christ, the God who gives people second chances. You probably need second chances to have a beautiful and meaningful life.
David Lim
----- Original Message -----
From: Inter.net Canada
To: dlim@interlog.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Spam
¡@
Dear David Lim,
Following our conversation here is the spam complaint that we have received from AOL. We have modified the sender's address to protect
his identity.
X-AOL-DATE: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 3:59:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Return-Path: <dlim@interlog.com>
Received: from rly-xj01.mx.aol.com (rly-xj01.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.38]) by air-xj01.mail.aol.com (v100.23) with ESMTP id MAILINXJ12-4fb40eda78ee; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:59:29 -0400
Received: from app1.nasc.inter.net (nasc-out-2.nasc.inter.net [203.176.60.254]) by rly-xj01.mx.aol.com (v100.23) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXJ15-4fb40eda78ee; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:59:10 -0400
Received: from ip2-25.eyrkonaeac07.dialup.ca.telus.com ([209.29.93.25] helo=1)
by app1.nasc.inter.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
id 1Bif30-0006YB-00
for XXXXX@aol.com; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:59:10 -0400
Message-ID: <003201c46526$a7450ee0$0301a8c0@1>
From: <dlim@interlog.com>
To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
Subject: Welcome to visit my site at: http://www.interlog.com/~dlim
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:03:35 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002F_01C46505.1F8B9620"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-AOL-IP: 203.176.60.254
------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C46505.1F8B9620
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="big5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Welcome to visit my site at: http://www.interlog.com/~dlim
As per our conversation, if we receive any further complaints we will have no choice but to suspend your plan. Due to your refusal to stop
doing it, or protect your computer it is highly likely that it will happen again in the future.
Inter.net Canada has a zero tolerance policy on SPAM. This email was unsollicited by the recipient and they reported it as SPAM.
We strongly suggest you do not send emails to mailing lists or to addresses that you do not know.
If there is any other way we can be of assistance, please contact us by replying to this email or communicating by phone to our Customer service department, which is available to you 24 hours a day. We are always pleased to assist you.
Sincerely,
Mathieu St-Amour
Supervisor
Tel: 1-800-920-7873 or 514-481-2585
Fax: 1-888-478-2745 or 514-481-2785
Inter.net Canada Ltd.
www.ca.inter.net
-=-
----- Original Message -----
From: dlim@interlog.com
To: Inter.net Canada
Cc: JosephYLee@aol.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: Spam - Your regretable policy
¡@
Thank you very much for your reply.
An electronic message is "spam" IF:
(1) the recipient's personal identity and context are irrelevant because the message is equally applicable to many other potential recipients; AND (2) the recipient has not verifiably granted deliberate, explicit, and still-revocable permission for it to be sent; AND
(3) the transmission and reception of the message appears to the recipient to give a disproportionate benefit to the sender.
All of these apply to the message since the recipient himself sent a complaint to AOL that the message was unsolicited. The message also
included a link to your website http://pages.interlog.com/~dlim which promotes your services as a photographer.
Thank you for your definition of "spam".
My photographic service is probably too dear for people like you to afford (I guess. Ever imagine you can spend thousands of dollars for a shot?). Many overestimate their own importance.
This person, as my own log confirms, is said to be a Korean Christian on his own web site, who sent an unsolicited e-mail (of his CHEMISTRY e-mail ministry) to me in the first place. I was/am responding to his invitation. And as a free person(you seems to be trying hard to take away these rights and foster a rigid rule for contact/reply)I may respond in many ways as I please.
This person, if careful to check his own record(perhaps his automatic software does not allow him to compare notes in the first place), ought to have my e-mail in his data-base in the first place, for his solicitation. This tell people how easy it is to disregard something.
I just replied to foster friendship.
Unlike some accusers, I have many career and qualification, and will always appear to have more to tell/represent.
Not all ISPs function as your own self.
The accuser could have replied for clarification, unsubscription or simply block the sender. A big fuss is made, with ir-repairable damages.
You are acting beyond the law of the land, as you claim that SPAM is not illegal by Canadian Law.
I think some good souls out there would be more incline to work with the law of the land, or be good characters.
I try not to pile up lies, and falsehood, and conjecture in my mind. Do you not want to occupy yourselves with beautiful things instead?
The words "if", "might be" can fabricate worlds of falsehood, and wrongly steer logic/reasoning. I prefer to be realistic.
Evidence is not a matter of "if" or "might".
The device of AOL is described by yourselves leaves much room for improvement. Your software probably works like your very selves.
Again, I would say that Jesus Christ, I believe, can change your lives and values in positive ways.
David Lim
----- Original Message -----
From: Inter.net Canada
To: dlim@interlog.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Spam - Your regretable policy
¡@
Dear David Lim,
We thank you for taking the time to contact us.
In response, in the past year over 98 billion emails were sent through our servers and 4% of it were legitimate emails. SPAM is the indisputable
scourge on the Internet and we need to take action against it since Canadian Law still does not make SPAM illegal.
Keep in mind that this is only 1 complaint that we have received from someone at AOL. This means that there might be many more emails being
sent without your knowledge since you even confirm that you do not send emails to AOL. Your failure to comply to get an anti-virus or firewall
software to protect your computer leaves us no choice but to suspend the account in the event of any future complaints.
We contacted AOL since they are the ones taking out the user information from the headers. They have told us that the spam was reported
by JosephYLee@aol.com and he deemed it was unsolicited. This means that they reported this email as spam by using the automatic AOL
feature or they have a spam reporting software that does it automatically.
If you do leave our company due to a suspension of service we wish to remind you that all the other ISP's will suspend you for sending out SPAM.
Here is the technical definition of SPAM :
An electronic message is "spam" IF:
(1) the recipient's personal identity and context are irrelevant because the message is equally applicable to many other potential recipients; AND (2) the recipient has not verifiably granted deliberate, explicit, and still-revocable permission for it to be sent; AND
(3) the transmission and reception of the message appears to the recipient to give a disproportionate benefit to the sender.
All of these apply to the message since the recipient himself sent a complaint to AOL that the message was unsolicited. The message also
included a link to your website http://pages.interlog.com/~dlim which promotes your services as a photographer.
If there is any other way we can be of assistance, please contact us by replying to this email or communicating by phone to our Customer service department, which is available to you 24 hours a day. We are always pleased to assist you.
Sincerely,
Mathieu St-Amour
Supervisor
Tel: 1-800-920-7873 or 514-481-2585
Fax: 1-888-478-2745 or 514-481-2785
Inter.net Canada Ltd.
www.ca.inter.net
----- Original Message -----
From: dlim@interlog.com
To: Inter.net Canada
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Spam - Your regretable policy
¡@
Thank you very much for your e-mail after a phone call.
You claimed that you received many complaints, and have to take action.
Your e-mail warning in the past could not be replied to for any follow up.
I do not know anybody of undisclosed e-mail account. It is impossible in my part to send any e-mail to undisclosed or account with unknown address.
Please send real evidence if you have any.
One e-mail complaint hardly constituted to "many". I regard this as your refusal to send evidence or that you have born false witness.
You cannot put on any coverup and claim that you have real complaint. I regard this as false witness.
To the best of my knowledge AOL is a large company, and I have not sent any e-mail to AOL. Users of services ofAOL are not AOL, just as I am not Inter.net or your good self.
There is no evidence that the alleged recepient has been repeatedly receiving the same or anything from me. One off spam? Have you not sent me e-mail(in the name of warning) without my consent or foreknowledge? How are you going to comply to your rule and remove/suspend yourselves from further e-mailing me? You need to be reported that it is SPAM to take action instead of using common sense? I report you then. OK? I suppose your excuse will come soon as another solicitation without my foreknowledge.
Definition of "SPAM" includes the characteristics of untraceable source from unknown person. It does appear that a e-mail address with my name on is easily traceable and not from unknown person. I also have freedom to solicit friendship through any medium. The receipient could reply and ask me to take him/her off my list. Your evidence does not demonstrate any such action. I have no other means of taking such hostile or unsociable entity off my list.
This receipient/evidence of yours appear to me to be someone who aim to hurt me and effect some disruptive service instead of suffering from spam or from my invitation. You appear to be less than friendly and helpful.
I regret to have joined Interlog or your Inter.net Canada. Canadian friendliness does not appear to be part of your character.
In law, in case you know any, defendant has to right to know and face the accuser. You have violated this rule with what you have done.
You sound legalistic, yet with a front of illegal and unfriendly move.
You also indicate you have a zero tolerance policy of complaint (your words: if we receive any further complaints we will have no choice but to suspend your plan. )
I will have to leave your company and service and ask for full refund of the remaining fees paid in any case(or action) of your suspension or lack of service.
Any inconvinence caused by your action and attitude is very regretable.
I would like to suggest that you come to investigate into the salvation of Jesus Christ, the God who gives people second chances. You probably need second chances to have a beautiful and meaningful life.
David Lim
----- Original Message -----
From: Inter.net Canada
To: dlim@interlog.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Spam
¡@
Dear David Lim,
Following our conversation here is the spam complaint that we have received from AOL. We have modified the sender's address to protect
his identity.
X-AOL-DATE: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 3:59:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Return-Path: <dlim@interlog.com>
Received: from rly-xj01.mx.aol.com (rly-xj01.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.38]) by air-xj01.mail.aol.com (v100.23) with ESMTP id MAILINXJ12-4fb40eda78ee; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:59:29 -0400
Received: from app1.nasc.inter.net (nasc-out-2.nasc.inter.net [203.176.60.254]) by rly-xj01.mx.aol.com (v100.23) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXJ15-4fb40eda78ee; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:59:10 -0400
Received: from ip2-25.eyrkonaeac07.dialup.ca.telus.com ([209.29.93.25] helo=1)
by app1.nasc.inter.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
id 1Bif30-0006YB-00
for XXXXX@aol.com; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:59:10 -0400
Message-ID: <003201c46526$a7450ee0$0301a8c0@1>
From: <dlim@interlog.com>
To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
Subject: Welcome to visit my site at: http://www.interlog.com/~dlim
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:03:35 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002F_01C46505.1F8B9620"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-AOL-IP: 203.176.60.254
------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C46505.1F8B9620
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="big5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Welcome to visit my site at: http://www.interlog.com/~dlim
As per our conversation, if we receive any further complaints we will have no choice but to suspend your plan. Due to your refusal to stop
doing it, or protect your computer it is highly likely that it will happen again in the future.
Inter.net Canada has a zero tolerance policy on SPAM. This email was unsollicited by the recipient and they reported it as SPAM.
We strongly suggest you do not send emails to mailing lists or to addresses that you do not know.
If there is any other way we can be of assistance, please contact us by replying to this email or communicating by phone to our Customer service department, which is available to you 24 hours a day. We are always pleased to assist you.
Sincerely,
Mathieu St-Amour
Supervisor
Tel: 1-800-920-7873 or 514-481-2585
Fax: 1-888-478-2745 or 514-481-2785
Inter.net Canada Ltd.
www.ca.inter.net
-=-
----- Original Message -----
From: dlim@interlog.com
To: JosephYLee@aol.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: Spam Disruption -Welcome to visit my site at: http://www.interlog.com/~dlim
Information from my own log:
Inviting a Korean Christian to visit my site
You never know what people are going to do in the first instance.
----- Original Message -----
From: dlim@interlog.com
To: JosephYLee@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 4:03 PM
Subject: Welcome to visit my site at: http://www.interlog.com/~dlim
-=-
----- Original Message -----
From: dlim@interlog.com
To: Inter.net Canada
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Spam - Your regretable policy
Thank you very much for your e-mail after a phone call.
You claimed that you received many complaints, and have to take action.
Your e-mail warning in the past could not be replied to for any follow up.
I do not know anybody of undisclosed e-mail account. It is impossible in my part to send any e-mail to undisclosed or account with unknown address.
Please send real evidence if you have any.
One e-mail complaint hardly constituted to "many". I regard this as your refusal to send evidence or that you have born false witness.
You cannot put on any coverup and claim that you have real complaint. I regard this as false witness.
To the best of my knowledge AOL is a large company, and I have not sent any e-mail to AOL. Users of services ofAOL are not AOL, just as I am not Inter.net or your good self.
There is no evidence that the alleged recepient has been repeatedly receiving the same or anything from me. One off spam? Have you not sent me e-mail(in the name of warning) without my consent or foreknowledge? How are you going to comply to your rule and remove/suspend yourselves from further e-mailing me? You need to be reported that it is SPAM to take action instead of using common sense? I report you then. OK? I suppose your excuse will come soon as another solicitation without my foreknowledge.
Definition of "SPAM" includes the characteristics of untraceable source from unknown person. It does appear that a e-mail address with my name on is easily traceable and not from unknown person. I also have freedom to solicit friendship through any medium. The receipient could reply and ask me to take him/her off my list. Your evidence does not demonstrate any such action. I have no other means of taking such hostile or unsociable entity off my list.
This receipient/evidence of yours appear to me to be someone who aim to hurt me and effect some disruptive service instead of suffering from spam or from my invitation. You appear to be less than friendly and helpful.
I regret to have joined Interlog or your Inter.net Canada. Canadian friendliness does not appear to be part of your character.
In law, in case you know any, defendant has to right to know and face the accuser. You have violated this rule with what you have done.
You sound legalistic, yet with a front of illegal and unfriendly move.
You also indicate you have a zero tolerance policy of complaint (your words: if we receive any further complaints we will have no choice but to suspend your plan. )
I will have to leave your company and service and ask for full refund of the remaining fees paid in any case(or action) of your suspension or lack of service.
Any inconvinence caused by your action and attitude is very regretable.
I would like to suggest that you come to investigate into the salvation of Jesus Christ, the God who gives people second chances. You probably need second chances to have a beautiful and meaningful life.
David Lim
----- Original Message -----
From: Inter.net Canada
To: dlim@interlog.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Spam
¡@
Dear David Lim,
Following our conversation here is the spam complaint that we have received from AOL. We have modified the sender's address to protect
his identity.
X-AOL-DATE: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 3:59:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Return-Path: <dlim@interlog.com>
Received: from rly-xj01.mx.aol.com (rly-xj01.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.38]) by air-xj01.mail.aol.com (v100.23) with ESMTP id MAILINXJ12-4fb40eda78ee; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:59:29 -0400
Received: from app1.nasc.inter.net (nasc-out-2.nasc.inter.net [203.176.60.254]) by rly-xj01.mx.aol.com (v100.23) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXJ15-4fb40eda78ee; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:59:10 -0400
Received: from ip2-25.eyrkonaeac07.dialup.ca.telus.com ([209.29.93.25] helo=1)
by app1.nasc.inter.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
id 1Bif30-0006YB-00
for XXXXX@aol.com; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:59:10 -0400
Message-ID: <003201c46526$a7450ee0$0301a8c0@1>
From: <dlim@interlog.com>
To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
Subject: Welcome to visit my site at: http://www.interlog.com/~dlim
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:03:35 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002F_01C46505.1F8B9620"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-AOL-IP: 203.176.60.254
------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C46505.1F8B9620
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="big5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Welcome to visit my site at: http://www.interlog.com/~dlim
As per our conversation, if we receive any further complaints we will have no choice but to suspend your plan. Due to your refusal to stop
doing it, or protect your computer it is highly likely that it will happen again in the future.
Inter.net Canada has a zero tolerance policy on SPAM. This email was unsollicited by the recipient and they reported it as SPAM.
We strongly suggest you do not send emails to mailing lists or to addresses that you do not know.
If there is any other way we can be of assistance, please contact us by replying to this email or communicating by phone to our Customer service department, which is available to you 24 hours a day. We are always pleased to assist you.
Sincerely,
Mathieu St-Amour
Supervisor
Tel: 1-800-920-7873 or 514-481-2585
Fax: 1-888-478-2745 or 514-481-2785
Inter.net Canada Ltd.
www.ca.inter.net